Drilling Deeper on CAI International

Last week CAI International (NYSE:CAI) priced a new issue of fixed-to-floating preferred stock with an initial coupon of 8.50%.  At first glance at the initial coupon and the 5.82% spread when the issue goes to floating rate in 5 years we thought this would be a decent issue to buy.  Since that time we have drilled down much deeper into historical data of the company and have determined we should hold up for now.

CAI has become one of the largest owners of shipping containers on the globe with a fleet of over 1.2 TEU (20 foot equivalent) million units.  These containers range from the standard 20′ dry units we see all around the county on rail flatbeds to refrigerated units and specialized swap bodies which are made for over the road use in Europe.

In addition to their container ownership the company owns and leases over 7,000 rail cars of all types from dry bulk to tankers.

The company has done an excellent job of keeping the fleet utilized with over 97% of the fleet leased.

Additionally the company has a sizable logistics company which provides truck brokerage, warehousing and freight forwarding.

It is easy to see that this business (all of them whether containers, rail cars or logistics) is heavily dependent on the health of the global economy.  Of course almost all businesses are dependent on a healthy economy, but a limited number of them have debt of almost 5 1/2 times revenue.  This ranks right up there with the ocean shippers from a financial perspective–huge investment with high debt loads.  This is $2 billion in mostly floating rate debt that has to be paid for in good economies and bad.  This is a tremendous burden and honestly except for utilities we don’t like to see this high debt level in an investment.

As we review the last 5 years 2013-2017 we see the net income has ranged from $5 million in 2016 to $72 million in 2017 with free cash ranging from $111 million in 2016 to $183 in 2017. Stellar number–depreciation is huge on a fleet of containers and rail cars so the non cash depreciation charge is over $100 million/year.

In the 1st 9 months of 2017 the company had revenue of $254 million with net income of $35 million ($1.83/share).  With cash flow of $117 million (net plus depreciation).  Tremendous numbers.  At the same time here is what the common stock did–




So when an investor looks at these numbers at 1st glance they appear to be excellent–and they are excellent.  But is the reward adequate for the risk?  There is no common stock dividend which would help to be a margin of safety.  Would seem to me that a common dividend would be warranted.  Also 1 look at the common which has headed sharply lower while huge profits are announced seems strange–someone smells a rat here.

To determine if the reward is adequate to compensate us for the risk we have to look at the general global economic condition as well as a deeper history.

Briefly we think that the economies of the world are improving, but the growth rate is fairly modest and we think unlikely to speed up much if any from here.  Interest rates are being raised and while long term rates are not responding to higher short rates and investor has to wonder why if economies are doing well why won’t interest rates go higher.  Debt levels around the globe are higher than at any point in history and the U.S. has new budgets that will put the bond markets under stress (we believe) as buyers demand higher interest rates (which they haven’t done as of yet).  At the same time the U.S. is moving to quantitative tightening and other central banks are planning to do so by the end of the year.  Something has to give.

At the same time we are staring into higher interest rates CAI is buying containers and rail cars—to us chasing the economic growth that is currently in place, but which may very well wane later this year.  Additionally since CAI is a very international company any trade disruption will serve to pressure earnings.

This smells of the ocean shippers chasing current business by ordering bunches of ‘new builds’ that will never be needed.  The 1 saving grace is that containers and rail cars have a much shorter lead time that ocean ships.

CAI spent $370 million on new containers during the 1st 6 months of 2017 and while the claim is that they are spoken for with 8 year leases we are highly skeptical of these leases–as with ocean shippers the leases are only as good as the counter party  and sometimes they aren’t very good.  Bottom line is this is one heck of a large investment for a company with $348 million in revenue last year.  Remember that the company borrows money for these purchases.

We do note that the company claims that inflation and higher interest rates are good for the company blah, blah, blah.  Not buying that line irrespective of lease terms etc.

We could go on–but the bottom line is we think we need to wait and watch these shares.  We think the risk is high and the reward not quite high enough for us.  We think maybe another percent would help, but we shall see.

 

 

 

16 thoughts on “Drilling Deeper on CAI International”

    1. Hi Grid–you’re welcome–just my take.

      Did I see that the GDL 4% is hitting the public market?

      1. Tim, mine have not cleared yet in my account. I am still stuck in the middle, showing I own untradeable B shares and acquiring C shares. Brokerage said it could take 2-3 weeks after the 3/20 closing…
        I am not apparently going to get my full oversubscription request. Gabelli issued $131 million of C shares and $153 million was requested. Based on how B traded prior to the conversion announcement, I suspect it will head toward $50.50 after it begins trading. Of course that depends on how frisky the buyers are willing to sell I guess.

  1. I will be in there this week for sure–if it trades. I am full up (more than full) on my Kayne 3.5% so need another like it.

    I see etrade has it in the database so we shall see what happens.

    1. Brokerage probably padded the lag time to keep people from bothering them. As the process as showing in ones account looks a little “unnatural”.

    1. I know the system is always rigged, but wow…. You got a fully subscribed issue with no shares to be issued into market. I dont even have access to mine at all, and somebody gets out the door early to sell?

    2. My GDL-C shares all showed up as requested. Glad I received the additional ones also.

      1. Hi Grid–I picked up my first 100 shares yesterday. Not sure how many I want – probably at least 300.

        Thanks for keeping this one highlighted. I’ll take 4% ( or more) any day on a limited chunk of portfolio.

        1. Since Mario Gabelli personally owns at least 18% of this float, maybe there will be incentive to get the Board to approve a yield increase next year, lol.

          1. Hey Guys,
            Just so I understand, this particular issue is one you look at more of like a CD or treasury note that ‘guarantees’ the 4% pay rate at a minimum and that’s the draw to it? ‘Almost’ like you cannot lose money in it?
            I began reading about it yesterday and I thought I saw where it stated that it wouldn’t apy less than 4% to you, however, the issue could certainly trade below par value, maybe even significantly below par value.

            Just trying to get on the same page with you if you wouldn’t mind schooling me a bit more, please. I’ve owned other Gabelli items such as GRX, but that’s a totally different animal and in this environment, it seems like all low coupon offerings are shot down by you guys out of the gate, but this one is treated very differently.

  2. GW, this is not a “normal” preferred. It has built in protections that are unique from most, thus the lower yield. GDL-C is replacing GDL-B which was a 3% issued 7 years ago….The lowest it EVER traded was one penny below par. GDL-C will not likely trade below par…The investor put option is simply too valuable, plus the 1940 Investment Act also provides additional protection. Its along the lines of KYN-F, except it didnt have the puts. Coverage ratio though is higher with KYN-F, but GDL is fine…Heck the underlying GDL fund that the GDL-C juices was 40% cash last quarter.

    1. Thanks Bird… I have my buy order in so we’ll see if it comes down to me at $50.45. You know i already have the KYN-F’s and will treat them like a t-bill, basically. Cannot believe we are seeing the 10yr in mid 2.7’s. Mind boggling right after a raise from the Fed!

      1. Anytime, GW. You know I never have and still really havnt subscribed to much of a long end yield back up. Havent since 2013 Taper when I got in bigly to preferreds. Now I am not stupid blind though…I have an assortment of term dated and adjustables, but half is still the old perpetual. The exception being I tweaked it to where most are above call and past call that have a stiff side price support. Take MER-P….It is going to take a heck of a blow up to cause a drop off in 7% paper from BAC. (7.38% par). Yet it could leave a call welt, tomorrow. Ya takes your chances one way or another, depending on what is important to you.

      2. Picked up my 2nd 100 share’s today (200 total)–don’t know yet whether to load up or not. Maybe will wait until I see the pile of cash from the ABRN call next month.

        1. Settle down now, Tim…..More GDL-C, and slug load of KYN-F… …Somebody sounds like they are getting old and conservative before their time! 🙂

Comments are closed.